The world gets its first unquestionable proof of life far beyond the earth. According to CBS news, the meteorite that crashed in northwest Canada almost seven years ago might have been able to host the very earliest life forms, according to NASA researchers, which opens the door to the possibility that life could be present elsewhere in the universe.
The Tagish Lake meteorite is unique. Tiny bubbles in the rock are organic globules where the universe's earliest life forms could have been able to live. The meteorite is 4.5 billion years old –older than the earth.
This meteorite is unique because it was recovered froze and some of these samples came to scientists still frozen.
No one knows what is the source of the organic material in the meteorite. But one thing is for certain – those who question extraterrestrail life has to keep quiet this time. The proof is real and verifiable.
Jul 26, 2009
The world gets its first unquestionable proof of life far beyond the earth. According to CBS news, the meteorite that crashed in northwest Canada almost seven years ago might have been able to host the very earliest life forms, according to NASA researchers, which opens the door to the possibility that life could be present elsewhere in the universe.
Jul 25, 2009
Unanswered questions in trying to comprehend Bible for use in everyday situations. In search of a "blessed" life.
Click here for the full blog, updated very often!
Unexplained Mysteries of the Bible
I think it's a blog that is becoming more popular than Jesus Christ.
Jul 22, 2009
A complete explanation of vaccine religious exemption law is beyond the scope of an article (which is why I'm writing a book on the subject -- be on the look-out for this in the near future!), but an introduction to some of the complicating factors may not be.
First, in the U.S., vaccine requirements and exemptions (also known as exceptions or waivers) are addressed at the state law level, as the federal government lacks authority to address vaccine requirements and exemptions for state residents (federal laws do address vaccine requirements and exemptions for immigrants and the military; they also provides a means of avoiding vaccines in the workplace). Vaccines are legally required in all U.S. states and territories, but exemptions are also available in each state and territory that at least some residents may exercise.
One's right to refuse immunizations in the exercise of one's religious beliefs is a right afforded by both state and federal law in all but two states (Mississippi and West Virginia), primarily by way of state code and the U.S. Constitution's First and Fourteenth Amendments. So, right off the bat, vaccine religious exemptions necessarily involve a potentially complex mixture of state and federal law. Furthermore, on the state level, there are both statutes and regulations that must be reviewed to determine fully one's rights and options, and state constitutions may play a role as well.
Rights are seldom if ever absolute. One person's right to exercise their religion is limited by opposing rights -- in the case of vaccine religious exemptions, the state's right to require immunizations for the presumed benefit of society. Furthermore, determining your rights is not simply a matter of reading a state statute or a Constitutional Amendment. While those may be necessary starting places, they contain only broad generalizations that tell you little if anything about how that law applies to the specific set of facts and circumstances in your life. Make no mistake -- the application of those laws can vary, sometimes radically, with the widely varying circumstances of different individuals and families.
How do we determine, then, how the law applies to specific situations? We must look to legal precedent, or case law. Legislatures may make the laws, but it is the courts that interpret it -- on a case-by-case basis, one individual dispute at a time. When a case in a lower court is appealed to a higher court, the higher court (or federal district courts and some state trial courts) may issue a written "opinion" that serves as guiding precedent for the lower courts in future similar disputes. So, for starters, then, to determine what the law is for your specific situation, you must determine whether or not there is any legal precedent that applies.
Needless to say, the totality of court opinions constituting the body of precedent in any given area of law, at any given time, can never precisely address all of the different hypothetical future circumstances that may arise in that same area of law -- especially where there is limited precedent in the first place, as is the case with vaccine religious exemptions. When a situation comes up that doesn't clearly match any existing precedent, it may be difficult to say with any certainty what the law is for that specific situation. When precedent bears some resemblance to a current situation but is distinguishable from it, there may be opposing arguments about how the existing precedent applies to the present situation, with corresponding uncertainty as to the ultimate outcome.
Unfortunately, the complexity doesn't end there. Even if there is precedent that clearly applies to your specific situation, you still have to look to whether or not that precedent is "binding" or "persuasive." This depends on whether or not the precedent was issued by a court within your jurisdiction. If not, it is "persuasive precedent," and your local courts don't have to follow it. It may still support a legal argument for what your rights should be (e.g., how a court may or should rule if the matter ends up in court), but it won't determine what your rights are, and the bottom line is, a court could rule contrary to that precedent -- against you -- if it felt that doing so was the more just outcome in your particular case (and as you might well imagine, arguments favoring immunization often have the advantage).
Most of the federal precedent pertaining to vaccine religious exemptions comes from cases that arose in federal courts in New York State. Those precedent-setting cases were in federal district courts and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (which jurisdiction encompasses the states of New York, Vermont and Connecticut). If you live outside of New York (with regard to those court opinions from New York District Courts), or outside of NY, VT and CT (with regard to the opinion from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals), this precedent is not binding on the courts in your jurisdiction and serves only as a legal argument in support of a desired outcome. Sometimes, that argument is enough to get the exemption without having to take the case to court (though as a matter of practical reality, the argument may need to be made by an attorney); other times, it isn't.
One frequent question concerns those states with laws that require one to be a member of an organized religion with tenets in opposition to immunizations in order to qualify for a religious exemption. Such laws have been ruled unconstitutional in some state and federal courts. But that doesn't mean that similar laws in other states that have not been challenged in court are presently unconstitutional -- it only means that if such present laws in those other states were challenged in court, they may be ruled unconstitutional at that time. So, if you live in a state that has these requirements, you are legally bound by them unless and until the laws are changed, despite the likelihood that if challenged, those laws would be ruled unconstitutional. This doesn't mean there's no possibility of exercising a religious exemption in those states if you don't belong to the right kind of church, but if you did succeed, it would probably be because local officials chose not to spend the time and money defending a case they were likely to lose, and not because there was any uncertainty about the enforceability of the law as it currently stands.
Another common complication to exercising a vaccine religious exemption is the "practical reality" aspect. Even if you are clear about your rights under state and federal law and know the strengths and weaknesses of your position, you still have to deal with local authorities that may or may not know your legal rights, and who may or may not cooperate with you even if they do. Sometimes, exercising an exemption is very straightforward and proceeds without incident. Other times, local officials resist efforts to exercise a valid legal exemption. They have sometimes reportedly been rude, uncooperative, and even coercive or confrontational in their efforts to thwart efforts to exercise a valid, legal vaccine exemption.
Most of the time, these folks are genuinely concerned about the health and safety of you, your children and your community, but sometimes they overstep their boundaries in their zealousness to "protect" those concerned. But even those people who successfully exercise a religious exemption on their own inadvertently leave themselves susceptible to challenge, because of what they "don't know that they don't know" about the law on exemptions. For these reasons, and because of the many inherent legal complexities associated with vaccine religious exemptions generally, many people wisely choose to consult a knowledgeable attorney before declaring and exercising a vaccine religious exemption.
Jul 18, 2009
Millions of Bees Die - Are Electromagnetic Signals To Blame?
Bees in the US are dying of some unknown cause - millions of them are leaving their hives and do not come back. What is happening? The problem has got a name - colony collapse disorder - but no apparent cause.
Bee hive - Image credit: EnviroZine
Some years back, France and other European countries had a similar, if less severe die-off of honey bees. At the time Gaucho, a poisonous seed treatment chemical produced by Bayer, was blamed, the die-off has continued in Europe, although at a comparatively slower pace.
The situation in the US seems even more severe than what happened in Europe, and certainly the onset is more sudden. According to The Independent, millions of honey bees are abandoning their hives and flying off to die, leaving beekeepers facing ruin and US agriculture under threat.
"Across the country, from the Atlantic coast to the Pacific, honey bee colonies have started to die off, abruptly and decisively. Millions of bees are abandoning their hives and flying off to die (they cannot survive as a colony without the queen, who is always left behind).
Some beekeepers, especially those with big portable apiaries, or bee farms, which are used for large-scale pollination of fruit and vegetable crops, are facing commercial ruin - and there is a growing threat that America's agriculture may be struck a mortal blow by the loss of the pollinators. Yet scientists investigating the problem have no idea what is causing it."
On one of my weekly news grabs, I linked an article on the mysterious die-off of honey bees, and a reader commented, suggesting that emissions of GWEN, the Ground Wave Emergency Network, might be to blame. Here is what he had to say:
After reading several articles on the disappearance of the honeybee, the thought occurred that this appears to be happening only in the US. A Google search turned up nothing on this phenomenon in any other country, including Canada and Mexico.
Why only the US? Also, why are nonsensical excuses being offered up by the pseudo-scientific community for the demise of the bee?
Researchers have dubbed the syndrome the "colony collapse disorder." They say the bees presumably are dying in the fields, perhaps becoming exhausted or disoriented and eventually dying from exposure to the cold. Or, it could just be that the bees are stressed out. Give me a break!
Tired bees? Dying from weather exposure? Stressed out bees? Disoriented?
Just imagine a tired bee for a moment. When’s the last time you saw a tired bee?
Dying from weather exposure? Weather cold enough to kill bees in their hives would also decimate other insect populations. No report on that, huh?
Stressed out bees? What, all of a sudden bees get stressed out? What about bees in other countries? They don’t seem to be having a problem at all.
Disoriented bees? Ah, well this is a possibility. But what would make them disoriented? Perhaps it is the 250 HZ signals being pumped out of GWEN stations all over America. This signal makes people angry, so that they support the administrations idea of going after Iran and violence in general. It works great for mass manipulation of opinion. Unfortunately, the same signal will induce a misdirection of up to 10 degrees in the navigation ability of the honeybee. They go away from the hive and never come back because they can no longer find it. That’s why it’s only happening in the US.
Perhaps the most puzzling aspect of this is that US media has never ventured to question why it is only happening here. Somebody must have told them to clam up on this issue or the current crop of US reporters got their degrees in journalism out of a Cracker Jack box.
Now what the hell are GWEN stations, you might want to ask, and what could they have to do with the catastrophic die-off of honey bees...
GWEN, the Ground Wave Emergency Network, is a military communications network, consisting of some 300 transmitters dotting the whole of the continental United States. Each tower is 300-500 feet high. The stations are from 200 to 250 miles apart, so that a signal can go from coast to coast from one station to another. The official purpose is "to ensure adequate communication between command authorities and land-based strategic nuclear forces in the event of a nuclear attack on the United States mainland." But others say a hidden use of the system may be "electromagnetic mind-altering technology" by the use of ELF or Extremely Low Frequency waves.
According to a 1982 Air Force review of biotechnology, ELF has a number of potential military uses, including "dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare." The same report states:
"Electromagnetic systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. They are silent, and counter-measures to them may be difficult to develop."
Robert O. Becker, M.D., in his book "Crosscurrents: The Perils of Electropollution" said:
"GWEN is a superb system, in combination with cyclotron resonance, for producing behavioral alterations in the civilian population. The average strength of the steady geomagnetic field varies from place to place across the United States. Therefore, if one wished to resonate a specific ion in living things in a specific locality, one would require a specific frequency for that location. The spacing of GWEN transmitters 200 miles apart across the United States would allow such specific frequencies to be 'tailored' to the geomagnetic-field strength in each GWEN area."
The bees seem to be playing the role that canary birds had in the mines, warning us of impending desaster. Are these insects, by their unprecedented behavior of flying off without returning to their hives, showing that something insidious is going on?
According to a message from Paul Doyon, electromagnetic waves may well have the capacity of disorienting not only bees but a number of flying creatures. Here is a specific instance involving bees he quotes:
At Cornell Univ. honeybees in a hive relocated into a new building became disoriented. After extensive research ruled out other causes, someone noticed the hive was next to the building's electric transformer. The bees were confused by 60 hz magnetism strong enough to interfere with homing and communication to gather nectar and pollen. (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/RofD4.html)
In Germany, a study of honeybees irradiated with DECT mobile phone base station radiation found that only few of the irradiated bees returned to the hive, and that they required more time to return than the non irradiated bees. Also, the weight of the honeycombs of the irradiated bees was found to be smaller than those in the hives of non irradiated bees. (Stever H, Kuhn J, Otten C, Wunder B, Harst W. Verhaltensaenderung unter elektromagnetischer Exposition. Pilotstudie. Institut fuer Mathematik. Arbeitsgruppe Bildungsinformatik. Universitaet Koblenz-Landau; 2005. http://agbi.uni-landau.de/materialien.htm)
Jul 17, 2009
Posted by Neo at 18:38
So you think America actually landed men on the moon? Well, think again. We have proof that the moon landings in the late 60's and early 70's were all a big lie!
To start with, keep in mind that there was only about 100 people involved in the moon landing hoax. Mission Control in Houston as well as most of the men and women who worked on this project nearly 40 years ago had no idea it was a fake. But how is this possible? Very simple. The power elite who put on this fiasco never let anyone see too big of picture. The thousands of people involved only had their small part to worry about. Mission control was in Houston. The launch site in Florida. The engineers, mechanics, computer programmers etc, didn't have jobs that mixed with each other. So most people couldn't figure out the whole thing amounted to a Hollywood production.
In, 1962, then President John Kennedy said he had a vision of America "puting a man on the moon and returning him safely" before the decade is out. Now, we don't know if at the time Kennedy knew this was impossible or not but shortly after his murder in 1963, the best rocket scientists in the world involved with the project informed Lyndon Johnson that science is at least 30 years away from being able to accomplish such a task. The fact is...they were a little optimistic. Here we are nearly 40 years later and we still don't have the technology to send a man to the moon and return him safely to earth. The powers that be decided if they couldn't send a man to the moon and get him back safely, then what they would have NASA do is keep the billions of taxpayer money used to fund the project and then decided they could "fake" the whole thing for a fraction of the money they were being supplied.
Here are some facts to keep in mind about the impossibilty of actually sending a human being to the moon:
The moon is constantly being bombarded with "micrometeors" that travel at speeds of 20,000 mph. To keep that in perspective a rifle bullet travels at 800 mph. Remember the moon has no atmosphere to slow them down. If any astronaut or the Lunar landing module got hit with just one of those......even if it were the size of a grain of rice, that would be the end. Strange NASA wasn't too concerned about this at the time, don't you think?
Another problem is deadly radiation. Not only for the astronauts but the radiation would have fried any pictures they would have tried to take. It is absurd that NASA tried to pass off these so-called pictures from the moon. We'll show you in a minute that all NASA'S pictures are fakes.
The moon casts a shadow here on earth and it is 250,000 miles away. For the surface to be that bright, it would be blinding to anyone. Forget about getting pictures to come out. However none of the fake photo's the astronauts took back up this fact.
Neil Armstrong...the alleged first man on the moon, is now suffering from a mental illness because of being forced to live with this lie all his life. Strange that we never see any astronaut that walked on the moon talk in detail about their experience in public. Why don't they? NASA will not allow them to do so.
Before we show you the pictures which prove the moon landing was all a colossal hoax. We want to acknowledge photo analyst Jack White who went over thousands of photo's from NASA. He's an expert photographer and agrees these pictures are fake. Keep in mind each picture NASA put out has a code, like a social security number attached to it. It usually starts with the letter "A" and "S". So, you can search NASA"S website, punch in the code and that particular picture will come up. The pictures have all been coded for decades so no one can doctor any of the pictures with out it being easy to check against the code. For instance this picture is coded in the upper left hand corner: AS15-88-11901. So you know it's a real authentic picture put out by NASA and in this picture you can see the lunar rover was dropped into postion by a crane. There are no tire tracks left on the front or back of the vehicle. [CLICK ON PICTURES FOR LARGER IMAGES]
Now look at this next picture. It's a picture of Astronaut Buzz Aldrin taken in Mauna Kea Hawaii in 1969. If you look at the mountains behind him, you'll see it's the same mountain NASA used in faking the picture below it that was used in the Apollo 17 mission. Just look to the right side of the picture and you'll see it's the same mountain NASA photoshopped from the one behind Buzz Aldrin in Hawaii.
And, here's the same fake mountain........again.
And again! Geez, guys! c'mon, you must get tired of using the same fake backdrop from Hawaii over and over again?
Look at the center of the picture. You can see exactly where the movie set ends and the fake backdrop begins. Look for the same pattern on all NASA photo's.
Now, I don't know how NASA thought they could ever get away with this. Look at the decal on Apollo 15 that says "UNITED STATES" It's put on with nothing but scotch tape. Must be the new re-enforced scotch tape that can take those 400 degree temperatures.
Here's Astronaut Pete Conrad from Apollo 12. If you look in his visor, in the upper right hand corner you can see a reflection of a studio light. You can also see the "hotspot" the studio light illuminates on the ground also reflected in his visor.
This is an absurd photo of the Eagle, the lunar module from Apollo 11 while on the moon. Look close. It is nothing but cardboard (which you can see buckling), black roofing paper, gold Reynolds wrap aluminum foil, curtain rods and masking tape along with electrical engineers tape......ridiculous!!!!!
BELOW RIGHT: Here's a photo of Apollo 17 and the lunar rover. The picture on the top is BEFORE the lunar rover was unloaded and assembled. You can see it's still packaged and has rubber bands around it. The photo at the bottom shows what it looks like AFTER they broke open the package and supposedly assembled the rover. The package kind of looks like a baked potato broken open. The problem is you can see tire tracks in the photo BEFORE they broke open the package and assembled the rover. [MAKE SURE AND CLICK ON THIS LARGER IMAGE]
BELOW: This next NASA fake comes courtesy apollo 15. In most movie sets, the crew will take a picture of the set to try and frame it correctly before they start shooting with film. The same thing here. It's just that some absent minded photographer forgot and left the polaroids on the leg of the lunar module.......dohhhh!
By the way, if you think the photos left on the lunar lander are just weird reflections from the gold Reynolds Wrap. Photo Expert Jack White shows you how you can tell the difference.
BELOW RIGHT: These are two photo's of the LEM from apollo 16. The top one taken from the command module on it's way to the lunar surface and the one on the bottom was taken after it landed. The problem is the top picture shows that the lunar rover was to be unloaded from the RIGHT SIDE (R1) and then that just vanishes after it gets to the lunar surface and now seems to be on the LEFT SIDE (S2).
BELOW RIGHT: We think the photographers for Apollo 16 need to frame their phony pictures better. You can clearly see 6 studio lights at the top of this "Lights Camera, Action" picture.
BELOW LEFT: Is the lunar rover of apollo 15 leaving no tracks again which means it was put there from above.....most likely dropped into place from a crane.
Everyone of these pictures is of Buzz Aldrin from Apollo 11. Apparently he can't figure out how he wants to dress. In some pictures his moon suit is tucked into his moon boots, in some they are not. In some pictures his gloves are white, in some they're grey. Some pictures he has an antennea ...and some he doesn't. One picture shows him wearing a black arm band...and it disappears in others.
It should be obvious. The moon landing was a lie. It was all a studio production. Parts where filmed at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, parts were filmed in Arizona and part of it in Hawaii.
The moon landing lie is another illuminati signature fraud. It's not by chance we see that number 11 pop up again with Apollo 11 proving once again this was carried out by high ranking elitists. Remember the bible says in the last days there will be a "huge delusion" covering the planet. The fake moon landing is just another one of a long line of illuminati lies we have been exposing. Pass this information along to someone else you know who is a skeptic. Once again "have nothing to do with the unfruitfull works of darkness, but rather expose them."
Thanks to theconspiracyzone1.blogspot.com
Jul 16, 2009
Okay, so I noticed I'm getting a lot more views, which also means more money since some people are clicking my ads. But I think this next article is gonna make me lose some loyal viewers... the Christian ones anyway!
The following is some of the thousands of ways the bible contradicts itself and it's NOT in anyway meant to insult or offend Christianity. So, I hope any Christians who read this won't be insulted and could just look at it with an open mind and see the sarcasm in it. All the information is correct, I checked on all the bible pages.
GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness.
GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.
GE 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created.
GE 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created.
GE 1:20-21, 26-27 Birds were created before man was created.
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before birds were created.
GE 1:24-27 Animals were created before man was created.
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created.
GE 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time.
GE 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later.
GE 1:28 God encourages reproduction.
LE 12:1-8 God requires purification rites following childbirth which, in effect, makes childbirth a sin. (Note: The period for purification following the birth of a daughter is twice that for a son.)
GE 1:31 God was pleased with his creation.
GE 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation.
(Note: That God should be displeased is inconsistent with the concept of omniscience.)
GE 2:4, 4:26, 12:8, 22:14-16, 26:25 God was already known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) much earlier than the time of Moses.
EX 6:2-3 God was first known as "the Lord" (Jahveh or Jehovah) at the time of the Egyptian Bondage, during the life of Moses.
GE 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit.
GE 5:5 Adam lived 930 years.
GE 2:15-17, 3:4-6 It is wrong to want to be able to tell good from evil.
HE 5:13-14 It is immature to be unable to tell good from evil.
GE 4:4-5 God prefers Abel's offering and has no regard for Cain's.
2CH 19:7, AC 10:34, RO 2:11 God shows no partiality. He treats all alike.
GE 4:9 God asks Cain where his brother Able is.
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view.
GE 4:15, DT 32:19-27, IS 34:8 God is a vengeful god.
EX 15:3, IS 42:13, HE 12:29 God is a warrior. God is a consuming fire.
EX 20:5, 34:14, DT 4:24, 5:9, 6:15, 29:20, 32:21 God is a jealous god.
LE 26:7-8, NU 31:17-18, DT 20:16-17, JS 10:40, JG 14:19, EZ 9:5-7 The Spirit of God is (sometimes) murder and killing.
NU 25:3-4, DT 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21, PS 7:11, 78:49, JE 4:8, 17:4, 32:30-31, ZP 2:2 God is angry. His anger is sometimes fierce.
2SA 22:7-8 (KJV) "I called to the Lord; ... he heard my voice; ... The earth trembled and quaked, ... because he was angry. Smoke came from his nostrils. Consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it."
EZ 6:12, NA 1:2, 6 God is jealous and furious. He reserves wrath for, and takes revenge on, his enemies. "... who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire, and rocks are thrown down by him."
2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16 God is love.
GA 5:22-23 The fruit of the Spirit of God is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
GE 4:16 Cain went away (or out) from the presence of the Lord.
JE 23:23-24 A man cannot hide from God. God fills heaven and earth.
GE 6:4 There were Nephilim (giants) before the Flood.
GE 7:21 All creatures other than Noah and his clan were annihilated by the Flood.
NU 13:33 There were Nephilim after the Flood.
GE 6:6. EX 32:14, NU 14:20, 1SA 15:35, 2SA 24:16 God does change his mind.
NU 23:19-20, 1SA 15:29, JA 1:17 God does not change his mind.
GE 6:19-22, 7:8-9, 7:14-16 Two of each kind are to be taken, and are taken, aboard Noah's Ark.
GE 7:2-5 Seven pairs of some kinds are to be taken (and are taken) aboard the Ark.
GE 7:1 Noah was righteous.
JB 1:1,8, JB 2:3 Job was righteous.
LK 1:6 Zechariah and Elizabeth were righteous.
JA 5:16 Some men are righteous, (which makes their prayers effective).
1JN 3:6-9 Christians become righteous (or else they are not really Christians).
RO 3:10, 3:23, 1JN 1:8-10 No one was or is righteous.
GE 7:7 Noah and his clan enter the Ark.
GE 7:13 They enter the Ark (again?).
GE 11:7-9 God sows discord.
PR 6:16-19 God hates anyone who sows discord.
GE 11:9 At Babel, the Lord confused the language of the whole world.
1CO 14:33 Paul says that God is not the author of confusion.
GE 11:12 Arpachshad [Arphaxad] was the father of Shelah.
LK 3:35-36 Cainan was the father of Shelah. Arpachshad was the grandfather of Shelah.
GE 11:26 Terah was 70 years old when his son Abram was born.
GE 11:32 Terah was 205 years old when he died (making Abram 135 at the time).
GE 12:4, AC 7:4 Abram was 75 when he left Haran. This was after Terah died. Thus, Terah could have been no more than 145 when he died; or Abram was only 75 years old after he had lived 135 years.
GE 12:7, 17:1, 18:1, 26:2, 32:30, EX 3:16, 6:2-3, 24:9-11, 33:11, NU 12:7-8, 14:14, JB 42:5, AM 7:7-8, 9:1 God is seen.
EX 33:20, JN 1:18, 1JN 4:12 God is not seen. No one can see God's face and live. No one has ever seen him.
GE 10:5, 20, 31 There were many languages before the Tower of Babel.
GE 11:1 There was only one language before the Tower of Babel.
GE 15:9, EX 20:24, 29:10-42, LE 1:1-7:38, NU 28:1-29:40, God details sacrificial offerings.
JE 7:21-22 God says he did no such thing.
GE 16:15, 21:1-3, GA 4:22 Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac.
HE 11:17 Abraham had only one son.
GE 17:1, 35:11, 1CH 29:11-12, LK 1:37 God is omnipotent. Nothing is impossible with (or for) God.
JG 1:19 Although God was with Judah, together they could not defeat the plainsmen because the latter had iron chariots.
GE 17:7, 10-11 The covenant of circumcision is to be everlasting.
GA 6:15 It is of no consequence.
GE 17:8 God promises Abraham the land of Canaan as an "everlasting possession."
GE 25:8, AC 7:2-5, HE 11:13 Abraham died with the promise unfulfilled.
GE 17:15-16, 20:11-12, 22:17 Abraham and his half sister, Sarai, are married and receive God's blessings.
LE 20:17, DT 27:20-23 Incest is wrong.
GE 18:20-21 God decides to "go down" to see what is going on.
PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view.
GE 19:30-38 While he is drunk, Lot's two daughters "lie with him," become pregnant, and give birth to his offspring.
2PE 2:7 Lot was "just" and "righteous."
GE 22:1-12, DT 8:2 God tempts (tests) Abraham and Moses.
JG 2:22 God himself says that he does test (tempt).
1CO 10:13 Paul says that God controls the extent of our temptations.
JA 1:13 God tests (tempts) no one.
GE 27:28 "May God give you ... an abundance of grain and new wine."
DT 7:13 If they follow his commandments, God will bless the fruit of their wine.
PS 104:15 God gives us wine to gladden the heart.
JE 13:12 "... every bottle shall be filled with wine."
JN 2:1-11 According to the author of John, Jesus' first miracle was turning water to wine.
RO 14:21 It is good to refrain from drinking wine.
Thanks for reading, please subscribe!
Jul 15, 2009
Approximately half of the United States' drinking water supply is fluoridated in
an attempt to reduce dental cavities in children. Is this state of affairs
justified? Is it safe?
Most Americans are unaware of the dangers of ingesting fluoride.
Most dentists, physicians and scientists are unaware of the dangers of fluoride
and water fluoridation. According to a 1988 article in the prestigious Chemical
and Engineering News, scientific voices of opposition to fluoridation have been
suppressed, since 1950 when the U.S. Public Health Service first endorsed
fluoridation. Power tactics including threats, ridicule and frank censorship
aimed at scientists and clinicians knowledgeable about fluoridation have
prevented the truth about fluoride to be disseminated to the science world as
well as to the public. Whenever a public agency is charged with objectively
evaluating the safety of a procedure while at the same time endorsing and
recommending it, a serious conflict of interest is set up. This is exactly the
position of the U.S. Public Health Service for the past 44 years.
Facts About Fluoride
So, what are some of the facts about fluoride? According to the handbook,
Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, fluoride is more poisonous than lead
and just slightly less poisonous than arsenic. It is a cumulative poison that
accumulates in bone over the years. According to the Physicians Desk Reference,
"in hypersensitive individuals, fluorides occasionally cause skin eruptions
such as atopic dermatitis, eczema, or urticaria. Gastric distress, headache, and
weakness have also been reported. These hypersensitive reactions usually
disappear promptly after discontinuation of the fluoride."
From 1990 to 1992, the Journal of the American Medical Association published
three separate articles linking increased hip fracture rates to fluoride in the
water. In the March 22, 1990 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Mayo
Clinic researchers reported that fluoride treatment of osteoporosis increased
hip fracture rate and bone fragility.
A study by Procter and Gamble showed that as little as half the amount of
fluoride used to fluoridate public water supplies resulted in a sizable and
significant increase in genetic damage. Epidemiology research in the mid-1970's
by the late Dr. Dean Burk, head of the cytochemistry division of the National
Cancer Institute, indicated that 10,000 or more fluoridation-linked cancer
deaths occur yearly in the United States. In 1989, the ability of fluoride to
transform normal cells into cancer cells was confirmed by Argonne National
Laboratories. Results released in 1989 of studies carried out at the prestigious
Batelle Research Institute showed that fluoride was linked to a rare form of
liver cancer in mice, oral tumors and cancers in rats, and bone cancer in male
rats. Since 1991, the New Jersey Department of Health found that the incidence
of osteosarcoma, a type of bone cancer, was far higher in young men exposed to
fluoridated water as compared to those who were not.
In addition to the well documented toxic effects of fluoride, fluoride even
at dosages of 1 part per million, found in artificially fluoridated water, can
inhibit enzyme systems, damage the immune system, contribute to calcification of
soft tissues, worsen arthritis and, of course, cause dental fluorosis in
children. These are unsightly white, yellow or brown spots that are found in
teeth exposed to fluoride during childhood. In 1993, the Subcommittee on Health
Effects of Ingested Fluoride of the National Research Council admitted that 8%
to 51% and sometimes up to 80% of the children living in fluoridated areas have
dental fluorosis. Malnourished people, particularly children, usually targeted
for fluoridation, are at greater risks to experience fluoride's harmful effects.
Surprisingly, the most recent studies do not even show that water
fluoridation is effective in reducing tooth decay. In the largest U.S. study of
fluoridation and tooth decay, United States Public Health Service dental records
of over 39,000 school children, ages 5-17, from 84 areas around the United
States showed that the number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth per child
was virtually the same in fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas. Dr. John
Colquhoun, former Chief Dental Officer of the Department of Health for Auckland,
New Zealand, investigated tooth decay statistics from about 60,000 12 to 13 year
old children and showed that fluoridation had no significant effect on tooth
Given all of this scientific information, what is behind this push for
universal fluoridation? Prior to 1945, fluoride was properly regarded as an
environmental pollutant. It was responsible for many lawsuits against
industries, such as the aluminum industry and the phosphate fertilizer industry,
whose waste products contain large quantities of fluoride. This fluoride
destroyed crops and animals, leading to the lawsuits. The limited public view
was that fluoride was an environmental pollutant that needed to be reduced or
eliminated from the environment.
As a result of clever public relations campaigns, fluoride was transformed
from an environmental pollutant to an essential nutrient necessary for producing
healthy teeth. The science was poor, but the P.R. campaign was great. Being
against fluoride was like being against motherhood or apple pie. Industries not
only made millions from selling this environmental pollutant to water companies
and toothpaste companies, but more importantly, it saved billions of dollars
that would be required to clean up this environmental pollutant.
So, what can you do to protect yourself from fluoride?
fluoridated water. Much of the metropolitan area, including New York City water
is artificially fluoridated. Boiling water removes chlorine, but concentrates
fluoride. Water filters do not remove fluoride, unless there is a reverse
osmosis component. Children should avoid fluoridated vitamins and fluoride
treatments at the dentist. Everyone should avoid fluoridated toothpaste. The
concentration of fluoride in water is 1 ppm, in toothpaste 1,000 ppm and in
fluoride dental rinses 10,000 ppm. Work on your legislators to get fluoride out
of the water supplies.
This story has a beginning, it has a middle but it has no ending. The
'ending' will undoubtedly be written in countless hospital records, on tiny
gravestones, in the bones of the crippled and on the hearts of the bereaved.
Even so, the true cause of the 'ending' will never be advertised. One record
that slipped past the establishment net is duplicated herein but, believe it or
not, the existence of this 'death certificate' has been denied, in writing and
to overseas scientific inquiry, by Australian administrators.
What follows is but a fractional part of the 'middle' of a story that began
before the turn of the century and which was provoked by a statement contained
in an "Address in Reply to the Governor's Speech to Parliament", as recorded in
Victorian Hansard of 12 August 1987, by Mr. Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal
Party Member of the Victorian Parliament for South Barwon. Hence the title.
The relevant Hansard abstract is reproduced herewith. It is emphasized that
the writer imputes Mr. Dickinson with no other responsibility for the contents of
this thesis than being the parliamentary 'trigger' which motivated it and the
researched data which it contains.
"At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent
Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology
and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany.
"While there he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been
worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff.
"This was to control the population in any given
area through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride
occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time
reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and
narcotizing a certain area of the brain and will thus make him submissive to the
will of those who wish to govern him. "Both the Germans and the Russians added
sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid
In a book written by Dr Hans Moolenburgh of Haarlem, Holland, called Fluoride
- The Freedom Fight, the author describes the ultimately successful endeavors
to free the Dutch people from water
endeavors included the only properly conducted double-blind study ever done
anywhere in the world into the effects of tap water [1 p.p.m.].)
One brief passage is headed "Perkins", and a reproduction of that section
gives sufficient confirmation, by a remote and independent source, of the
"Dickenson Statement" as printed in Hansard, to reinforce the need for
additional investigation into this one 'behaviour control' aspect of the
'fluoride debate' and relate it to 1987. (The entire "Perkins" paragraph is
Elsewhere in this book, Dr Moolenburgh also relates how that first "Perkins"
anecdote was confirmed in differing ways and from reliable independent sources.
"When 1971 was drawing to a close, I received a paper containing a
strange story. This story was to haunt us repeatedly throughout the long,
drawn-out battle. It was a story resembling science fiction - bizarre and
unbelievable. There are those who warned me not to even mention this story, and
I can appreciate why. On the other hand, the task of an historian is not to
relate things as they should have happened, but as they actually did happen.
"...The Perkins saga was different from other fluoride stories.
"The story of industries hoodwinking the public into buying a pollutant
as a medicine is simply 'whodunnit'. Grotesque though it may sound, it is no
more that 'the consumer fraud of this polluted century' (as described in
Fluoridation and Truth
Decay by Gladys Caldwell). But the story I now read was different: it gave one
the cold shivers. It told of a chemical engineer, Mr. Perkins, who related how
immediately after the Second World War he was one the Americans put into the
well-known I.G.Farben Company in Germany. There he
discovered that I.G.Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the
occupied countries, because it had been found that
slight damage to specific parts of the brain. This damage had a very particular
effect. It mad it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom.
He became more docile towards authority.
"Scientists in the camps of both opponents and proponents of fluoride
have always dismissed this story as mere poppycock, but it had a life of its own
and reared its head time and again. It fed the suspicions of many people that
'there was more to
fluoridation than meets the eye'.
"As far as I know, there is no one who has done any serious research
into whether the fluoridated person is really more docile, easier to rule, more
impressed by authority than the non-fluoridated one. There is, though, one
peculiar thing: every Dutch doctor has a medical reference book for 1984. One of
the chapters is entitled "Tranquillisers". Looking at the "minor
I find twenty-four substances: their chemical formulae do not show any
connection with fluoride. However, there is also a heading ,
"major Tranquillisers". Of those there are twenty-seven, and seven of them are a
fluoride compound. One of these is Semap. It is one of the strongest
anti-psychotic substances we know. This means that twenty-five per cent of the
major Tranquillisers are connected with fluoride. I do not draw any conclusions.
The only thing one can say at this point is, with Alice: 'curiouser and
Actually there is little that is novel in the concept of controlling the
minds and manners of the multitude by chemical/dietary means. That it was
practised by Hitler's regime is made the more credible when we know that as far
back as 1938 the US Government, and ally to boot, and the government of a
democratic Christian country, was considering the transformation of American
citizens and others into 'zombies' by a number of proposed techniques. The US
Army searched for "the perfect incapacitating agent", according to General
Fellenz, "to put in the enemy's water supply". Included in the drugs tested were
the hallucinogenic LSD and the amnesiac BZ (10 times more potent than LSD), and
a "schizophrenic agent called bulbocapine".
The "Rockefeller Report" to the United States President on CIA activities
said: "The drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible
means of controlling human behaviour".
One drug which received special attention in the 'fifties and early 'sixties,
under the cryptonym of MK-ULTRA, was suxamethonium chloride (listed under a
number of product names including Anectine), a halogenated anti-cholinergic
agent with all the symptomatic side-effects up to and including cardiac arrest
ascribed to these agents in the medical literature.
Please retain the term "anti-cholinergic agent" in mind , for owing to the
health implications attendant on this particular anti-metabolic activity, it
figures repeatedly in this thesis.
Note: An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological behaviour
control, Dr George Estabrooks, later became Chairman, Department of Psychology,
Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains the most ardent
producer and advocate for the fluorination of a domestic product - fluoridated
Now, should the reader's mind be already boggled to the point of disbelief,
there are two facts which, if known about and/or remembered, may instill
sufficient confidence in that which is even more 'boggling' and is yet to come.
Bromine (or bromide) tea was administered to the enlisted men during the
First and second World Wars.
The halogen (bromine) ingredients was said to quell the libido of the men and
thus limit likely forays into the 'dens of iniquity' and the acquisition of
The second fact is that, today, all Australian military establishments
provide their own halogenated (fluoridated) water for the troops resident
therein, for the official reason that the element is good for developing teeth.
Either we have a very immature military force, all under that of twelve years
when the mythical effect of fluoride ceases to exist, or else there is another
more obscure, less altruistic reason for this drug 'treatment' of the troops.
Later on in this text we will recall certain happenings relative to
ex-trainees from those establishments and the paradoxical effects of fluorides
on behaviour of the human being.
The Parliamentary "Dickenson Statement" refers to "the vast Farben chemical
plants in Germany".
It has been said by Anthony C. Sutton in his book, Wall Street and the Rise
of Hitler: "Without the capital supplied by Wall Street, there would have been
no I. G. Farben in the first place, and almost certainly no Adolph Hitler and
World War II."
Interssen Gemeinschaft Farben (Interessen Gemeinschaft der Deutschen
Teerfarbeninduistrie, or, simply, I.G. Farben) was a German chemical
manufacturing concern that supplied the chlorine gas used by Germany during the
First World War, but the eventual creation of the huge I.G.Farben cartel began
in 1924 when American bankers began to arrange foreign loans in what Professor
Carroll Quigley terms "the Dawes Plan", "largely a J.P. Morgan production"/
In 1928 Henry Ford merged his German assets with I.G. Farben, to be followed
by the American Standard Oil Company (the Rockefellers) who, in concert with
I.G.Farben, developed the coal-to-oil hydrogenation process.
In a letter to Roosevelt from Berlin in the early 'thirties, the US
Ambassador in Germany, William Dodd, said:
"At the present moment, more than a hundred American corporations have
subsidiaries here or cooperative understandings.
"The DuPonts have their allies in Germany that are aiding in the
armament business. Their chief ally is the I.G. Farben Company, a part of the
government which gives 200,000 marks a year to one propaganda organization
operating on American opinion.
"Standard Oil Company ... sent US$500,000 a year helping Germans make
ersatz [a substitute] gas [the hydrogenation process of converting coal to
gasoline] for war purposes; but Standard Oil cannot take any of its earnings out
of the country except in goods.
"The International Harvester Company president told me their business
here rose 33% a year [arms manufacture, I believe], they could take nothing out.
"Even our airplanes people have secret arrangements with Krupps.
"General Motors Company and Ford do enormous business here through
their subsidiaries and take no profits out."
The I.G. Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding company,
American I.G. Farben, which listed on its Board of Directors: Edsel Ford,
President of the Ford Motor Company; Chas. E. Mitchell, President of
Rockefeller's National City Bank of New York; Walter Teagle, President of
Standard Oil of New York; Paul Warburg, Chairman of the Federal Reserve and
brother of Max Warburg, financier of Germany's war effort; and Herman Metz, a
Director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs.
It is an interesting fact of history that three other members of the Board of
American I.G. Farben were tried and convicted as German "war criminals" for
their "crimes against humanity" during World War II, while serving on the I.G.
Farben Board of Governors. None of the Americans who sat on the same board as
those convicted was ever tried as a "war criminal".
Throughout the entire second World War conflict, not one bomb fell on the I.G.
Farben headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, allegedly as a consequence of Allied
In 1938, I.G. Farben borrowed 500 tons of tetra-ethyl lead, the gasoline
additive, from Standard Oil.
During 1939, the year Germany invaded Austria and Poland, the Standard Oil
Company of New Jersey loaned I.G. Farben US$20,000,000 worth of high-grade
In 1939 the American Aluminum Company (Alcoa), then probably the world's
largest producer of sodium fluoride, transferred its technology to Germany (the
Alted Agreement). The Dow Chemical Company transmitted its experience and
technology in that same period.
Germany's two largest tank manufacturers were Opel, a subsidiary of General
Motors (J.P. Morgan), and the German subsidiary of the Ford Motor Company.
Even with the purchase of oil from non-German sources, the major supplier of
oil was still the Farben cartel. The I.G. Farben cartel a monopoly on German
gasoline production. Just under one half of the Germans' high-octane gasoline in
1945 was produced directly by I.G. Farben, and most of the balance by its
So, in 1941 when cylinders of Zyklon B, the deadly cyanide-based
extermination gas made by I.G. Farben, were lethally unvalved on inmates of
Auschwitz, Bitterfeld, Walfen, Hoechst, Agfa, Ludwigshafen and Buchenwald, there
were more than substantial links between huge American technology and German
Two questions must be asked here: (a) Was I.G. Farben associated with the
formulation of Sarin and/or Soman, the German-developed fluorinated nerve gases
that made Zyklon B little more than an underarm deodorant by comparison?; and
(b) What of I.G. Farben today?
The answer to (a) is an unequivocal yes! As for (b), I.G. Farben signed
cartel agreements with such companies as Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI),
Borden , Carnation, General Mill, M.W. Kellogg Co., Nestlé and Pet Milk, and I.
G. Farben either owns outright, has had a substantial interest in or has had
other cartel agreements with Owl Drug, Parke-Davis and Co., Bayer and Co.,
Whitehall Laboratories, Chef-Boy-Ar-Dee Foods, Bristol Meyers and Squibb and
Sons. The list goes on and on and on and includes Proctor and Gamble who
'domesticated' the word "fluoride" with official encouragement in 1958, being
the originators of the infamous "Crest" fluoridated toothpaste campaign.
The only reference to "Farben" traceable in a limited search of modern
literature was in 25th Edition of Martindale, under "F.B.A. Pharmaceutical
Limited; Products of Farbenfabriken Bayer".
All corporate traces of the Hugh I.G. cartel have been absorbed by the
hundreds, if not thousands, of one-time cartel members, but the 'malady lingers
In Australia, the Dental Health and Research Foundation which has such names
as Colgate, Kellogg and the ex-I.G. Farben associates listed among its governors
and contributors has been irreverently but accurate dubbed "the fluoride mafia".
Closely allied with this Sydney University 'foundation' into the halogen
fluoride, its benefits and its hazards, have never been made available despite
numerous appeals. An ABC science show's examination of the scientific integrity
of Foundation 41 may explain the elusive (or is the word illusory?) data.
America is literally bursting at the seams with such foundations, were The
Rockefeller Foundation, The Carnegie Foundation and The Ford Foundation. It is
necessary to mention these specifically because they were the first foundations
to make grants in the population (control) field, and the Carnegie family merged
with the Mellon family Institute to create the Carnegie-Mellon University in
Pittsburgh in 1967.
The Mellon family were the founders of the original Mellon Institute whence
came the "amazing (but totally fallacious) sodium fluoride/dental caries
prevention discovery" - the discovery that literally turned 'garbage into gold'.
The Mellon family also founded the American Aluminum Company (Alcoa), the
largest producer of the waste toxin, sodium fluoride, which, up to this point of
'caries discovery', had relatively little known commercial or industrial value,
was an environmental hazard of great public concern, and was very costly in
terms of safe disposal.
So we retrace our steps to the "Dickenson Statement" in Hansard and Chas
In a letter abstracted from
Lawlessness (published by the Committee for Mental Health and National Security)
to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on 2nd
October 1954, a Charles Eliot Perkins, scientist and author of Washington, DC,
and, one must assume, the same Charles Eliot Perkins of the "Dickenson
Statement" to the Victorian Parliament, said this (and the words of the last two
lines of the second paragraph cannot be overemphasised): "We are told by
the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the
fluoridation of the water
supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth
decay in children, and it is the plausibility of this excuse, plus the
gullibility of the public and the cupidity of public officials that is
responsible for the present spread of artificial water
fluoridation in this
"However - and I want to make this very definite and positive - the
real reason behind water
fluoridation not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason,
there are many ways in which it could be done which are much easier, cheaper and
far more effective. The real purpose behind water
fluoridation is to reduce
the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty ...
Nazis, under Hitler,
decided to go into Poland ... the German General Staff and the Russian General
Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel and the
scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian
Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communise the world ...
"I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has
spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, Bo-chemistry, physiology and
pathology and pathology of fluorine: any person who drinks artificially
fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same
person, mentally or physically."
Mr. Perkins does not involve America, American institutions or individuals in
his assertions, but when Major George Racy Jordan was in charge of the
massive 'lend-lease airlift' operations from Great Falls, Montana, to Russia via
Alaska, he queried the transshipment of considerable amounts of sodium
fluoride via Fairbanks, Alaska, to Russia. He was told "frankly" that it
was to put into the drinking water in the prisoner-of-war camps to take away
their will to resist.
The published knowledge that sodium fluoride was known for this mind - and
behaviour - changing potential was available at the start of this century, as
witness such entries as "Fluoricum Acidum" (Encyclopedia of Pure 'Materia
Medica', vol. ix, p. 333).
America has long been interested in behaviour and mind control by chemical
means. Americans who were at once financiers, industrialists and population -
control advocates were intimately involved with Germany where chemical
extermination and chemical behaviour control by, inter alia, sodium fluoride,
were placed into practice. America transferred this knowledge and material,
inter alia, to Russia during its 'lend-lease' co-operation. An American major
producer of aluminum was the world's major source of sodium fluoride. American
'education and research' funded by (a) the major sodium fluoride producer, and
(b) a 'foundation' involved in population control, was the origin of 'the dental
caries prevention myth' associated with sodium fluoride.
A predominantly American company was the first to exploit this concept in
dentifrice production, and American 'medical research' figured largely in the
'fluorination' processes that converted the negative embarrassment of mounting
industrial waste to huge positive profit increases - processes that other
countries hastened to emulate; processes which include the enormous outlet for
fluorides in the fluoridation
of water supplies.
Although fertiliser production has not been a part of this thesis, the
following 'connections' with this point should be made. The manufacturing
processes for synthetic dyes, explosives and fertiliser are almost chemically
synonymous, and I.G. Farben was expert in all production phases of these
'necessities'. Sodium silico-fluoride was a waste constituent from the refining
of phosphate rock, until a 'use' could be found or created for the waste.
A letter (reproduced on page 28) from the United States Environmental
Protection Agency throws the spotlight on the unique 'waste disposal via the
public kidney' concept that was created.
The question raised by the Hansard "Dickinson Statement", and perhaps
aggravated by this dissertation and data, is this: Was the Australian
Government, in 1962-3 when it illegally (Australian Constitution, Section 51 [xxiiiA])
of water supplies" to Australia, aware of its grotesque actions and of the grave
results? The 'shonky' method of introducing, plus legal and official
correspondence at that time, indicates in the affirmative.
Was the Crisp Royal Commission, when it 'found' in favour in
incidentally, in favour of the major polluter and producer of fluoride in
Tasmania (Electrolytic Zinc Corp., Risdon, Hobart), aware of the consequences of
any such favourable findings? Conditions then and since mingle with some
incredible documented coincidences, and unbelievable but documented official
behaviour, including that of premiers and health ministers, and the paucity of
current State parliamentary investigations into fluorine-based environment
problems, to convince the most skeptical that it was.
Was the Victorian Premier (Sir Rupert Hamer, who was later to publicly
declare the dictatorial credo, "It was always tempting to override the people
and impose a new order"), aware of these background facts when he instituted
fluoridation legislation and a subsequent fraudulently conceived and
executed cover-up "inquiry"? (Ballarat Courier, 6 October 1982) Irrespective of
the obviously familial supplier advantages, it seems certain that he was certain
that he was so aware. Widespread publicity regarding subsequent alleged complex
land company fraud transactions would seemingly underwrite the existence of the
necessary character attributes to perform as implied.
Are the lies, denials, fabrications and evasions evident in Geelong with two
fluoride pollution sources (aluminum smelting and fertiliser production), and
Portland with ditto sources, no more than "job protection" and "rate protection"
scares as is claimed, or is there a deeper, wider federal or international
instructional background behind the unmonitored pollution, with the health
detriment there from and the 'secrecy legislation' invoked for the Victorian
[Was] Mrs. Thatcher's astronomical expenditure of United Kingdom revenue on a
fluoridation campaign in
Northern Ireland a matronly concern for the youngsters' teeth, or perhaps an
attempt to sedate the people and render them subservient to her autocratic
dictates? Remember this. Mrs. Thatcher has a background of academic chemistry and
would be far from ignorant of the tranquillising effects of the halogens and
Similarly, her legal and political shenanigans (that is the only word to
describe her behaviour) in the England
fluoridation scene offer
many avenues for questioning of her motives.
Are the lies, fabrications, omissions, evasions and official hysteria in the
federal government and bureaucracy at the very mention of fluorides, fluoride
pollution or water
fluoridation, also common to the state governments and bureaucracies, and
repeatedly backed up by the most lunatic science (as witness, the ministerially
approved and internationally derided propaganda from the National Health and
Medical Research Council), royal and vice-regal intransigence, a frightening
exhibition of this grim foreknowledge, all of which has abundant documentary
support, or simply no more than dastardly coincidence?
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Washington , D.C. 20460
MAR 30 1983
OFFICE OF WATER
Leslie A.Russell, D.M.D.
363 Walnut Street
Newtonville, Mass. 02160
Dear Dr Russell:
Thank you for you letter of March 9, 1983, in regard to the
fluoridation of drinking
The information available to the Environmental Protection Agency is that
fluoridation is a safe
and effective means for reducing the occurrence of dental caries. The
fluoridation process has
been endorsed by several Presidents of the United States and by several Surgeons
General, including the current Surgeon General, Dr C. Everett Koop. A copy of Dr
Koop's statement on
fluoridation is enclosed.
Water treatment chemicals, including fluosilicic acid, have been evaluated
for their potential for contributing to the contamination of drinking water. The
Water Treatment Chemicals Codex, published by the National Academy of Sciences,
prescribes the purity requirement for fluosilicic acid and other
In regard to the use of fluosilicic acid as a source of fluoride for
fluoridation, this Agency
regards such use as an ideal environmental solution to a long-standing problem.
By recovering by-product fluosilicic acid from fertiliser manufacturing, water
and air pollution are minimized, and water utilities have a low-cost source of
fluoride available to them. I hope this information adequately responds to your
Administrator for Water
That last article was from beefreetech.com
Thanks for reading and please subscribe.
The truth about the Columbine Highschool Massacre that took place in April 20, 1999 -11:19 am – 12:08 pm.
No, this conspiracy has nothing to do with Marilyn Manson - although the government is convinced that his bad influence on kids is what caused this:
COLUMBINE MASSACRE AND COVERUP - PART 1
Posted By: RMNewsUpdates
Date: Tuesday, 29-Jan-2002 15:15:02